Which of the following is considered a BK (bankruptcy) crime that can prevent discharge?

A bankruptcy crime that can prevent the discharge of debts is defined as misconduct occurring in the context of bankruptcy proceedings. When someone is found guilty of a bankruptcy crime, it undermines the integrity of the bankruptcy system. Such crimes can include fraud, concealment of assets, or making false statements under oath. If a debtor is guilty of such actions, the court can deny their discharge, meaning they remain liable for the debts they sought to eliminate.

In the context of the other options, requesting a delay in hearings, filing improper documents, or accumulating additional debts, while they may reflect poor conduct or mismanagement, do not constitute criminal activities impacting the discharge of debts. A delay in hearings can occur for legitimate reasons, and filing improper documents may be rectified without necessarily indicating criminal intent. Similarly, accumulating additional debts—while potentially demonstrating a lack of financial responsibility—does not equate to committing a crime within the bankruptcy framework. Therefore, understanding the nature of bankruptcy crimes is crucial for navigating the legal landscape surrounding debt discharge.